Skip to content
Daily Theology
  • Podcast
  • Shark WeekS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Search
Catholic Social Teaching, Ethics, Guest Post, Social Justice
by The EditorsFebruary 27, 201411:21 amApril 25, 2014

A (Truly) Consistent Commitment to Life

Joseph Cardinal Bernardin
Joseph Cardinal Bernardin

By Dan Cosacchi

As most of the readership of this blog is undoubtedly aware (thanks in no small part to Kevin Ahern’s recent incisive post), Joseph Cardinal Bernardin remains a controversial figure almost two decades after his death. In December 1983, Bernardin presented the Gannon Lecture at Fordham University, and there presented an argument for the “Consistent Ethic of Life” (CEL). I wish to focus briefly on this lecture in responding to Robert Christian’s fascinating and thought-provoking piece, which argues that the CEL movement has actually been inconsistent in applying their ethical philosophy. Before responding to this point, it would be worthwhile to use Bernardin’s own thought in response to Christian’s essay.

To be entirely fair, Christian’s admitted personal philosophy – which he terms “Whole Life” – is not terribly different from the mainstream understanding of CEL. In this sense, Christian is starting from a position that is ideologically very close to CEL. His essay should not be read in the same vein as other thinkers who have dismissed CEL wholesale. That point notwithstanding, Christian touches on a very interesting question: what is the relationship of CEL to pacifism? Christian laments, “Over and over again, despite personal assurances to me by many in the movement that I need not be a pacifist to be a part of their cause, the consistent life movement has alienated and excluded proponents of just war theory and the Responsibility to Protect.”

I have no reason to doubt Christian’s sincerity in making this statement, so I must express sadness that many in the movement have presented it like this to Christian. When Bernardin introduced CEL a few months after the United States bishops wrote The Challenge of Peace, he explicitly wanted to connect that pastoral letter with other life issues, like abortion, capital punishment, and euthanasia. As the chair of the episcopal committee that drafted the letter, Bernardin understood that the philosophical viewpoint of the bishops ran the gamut on the question of war and peace. Even in the small committee there was an absolute pacifist (Bishop Thomas Gumbleton) and an auxiliary bishop of the military vicariate (then-Bishop John O’Connor). The letter itself certainly did not call for the American church to adopt absolute pacifism as its stance. If anything, its emphasis was on the just war tradition of the church; it called for absolute pacifists and adherents to the just war theory to work together. Furthermore, it called for a nuclear pacifism that all American Catholics could embrace.

Such a type of contingent pacifism does not discount the possibility of using military force in situations which meet all the criteria for a just war. However, Christian brings up another interesting question here: is there room for both absolute pacifists and adherents to just war theory in the authentic CEL? My answer to this question, along with Bernardin and The Challenge of Peace, is in the affirmative. While Christian maintains his personal respect for absolute pacifists, he also claims, “But for those that argue that the use of force always results in more death and destruction, my reply is that they are absolutely, unequivocally incorrect in those assumptions and claims.” It is difficult for pluralistic groups of people to work together for peace and justice when such a clearly negative judgment has been made regarding a carefully constructed conviction about a strict adherence to nonviolence in all circumstances.

For its part, the Vatican has taken a clear position on the issue of the tragic violence that is currently taking place in Syria. Pope Francis, on a number of occasions has warned that Western intervention in Syria is the wrong tactic. On February 11, 2014, Archbishop Francis Chullikatt, Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the United Nations, testified before a United States Congressional committee about the dangers of committing American forces to Syria. Chullikatt’s experience as Apostolic Nuncio to Iraq from 2006-2010 gave him the unique perspective on the effect of Saddam Hussein’s ousting on the Christian community in Iraq. Since 1991, the Christian population has dropped from over a million to around 300,000 today, due in large part to lighter security for Christians. Certainly I or no other sane person would laud Saddam Hussein’s rule over Iraq, just like we would not support Bashar al-Assad. Nevertheless, as Archbishop Chullikat pointed out, “military intervention is not the solution.” Unlike Christian, I am not willing to call such an outlook “simply farcical.”

As a means of concluding, allow me to return to Bernardin and CEL. Bernardin ended his Gannon Lecture by making a salient point: “The issues of war, abortion, and capital punishment are emotional and often divisive questions. As we seek to shape and share the vision of a consistent ethic of life, I suggest a style governed by the following rule: We should maintain and clearly articulate our religious convictions but also maintain our civil courtesy. We should be vigorous in stating a case and attentive in hearing another’s case; we should test everyone’s logic but not question his or her motives.” Reflecting on this point made me so grateful that Christian ended his own essay in the way he did, by calling on members of the CEL movement to be more welcoming to adherents to the just war theory and those who advocate the Responsibility to Protect. He is absolutely correct in this matter. CEL is, by its very nature, both exclusive in that it comes from a particularly Roman Catholic setting, but also very inclusive in that its catholic principles encourage a fairly broad spectrum of views on the issue of war and peace. CEL practitioners would do well to take Cardinal Bernardin’s words to heart and open themselves to well-intentioned and pro-life thinkers such as Robert Christian.

Daniel Cosacchi is a Doctoral Student in Christian Ethics at Loyola University, Chicago. He is writing his dissertation on the environmental effects of warfare in Catholic social thought.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Tagged with: Cardinal Bernardin consistent ethic of life Dan Cosacchi Iraq just war Responsibility to Protect Robert Christian seamless garment Syria The Challenge of Peace

The Editors

All posts

iThere are no comments

Add yours

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Like us on Facebook!

Like us on Facebook!

Recent Posts

  • On The Privileges of Personhood
  • Invitation to an Antifascist Reading Space
  • Beyond Kendi: Antiracism and Non-White Sovereignty in the US Political Economy
  • Sinful and Holy: The Human Nature of the Church
Advertisements

Archive

Advertisements

Follow DT on Twitter

My Tweets
Advertisements

Like us on Facebook!

Like us on Facebook!
Advertisements

Tags

Advent Anti-Racism Catholic Catholic Church Catholicism Catholic Social Teaching Christianity Christmas Church College Theology Society discipleship faith Holy Spirit Hope Jesuits Jesus Jesus Christ Lent liberation theology love Mercy Oscar Romero podcast podcast season 1 Pope Francis Prayer racism Saint Leo University Saints spirituality Stephen Okey Stephen Okey Podcast Episode Theological Shark Week theology theology and culture
Advertisements

Authors

  • Amanda Osheim
  • Alexandria Griffin
  • Benjamin Durheim
  • Brian Flanagan
  • B. Kevin Brown
  • Brianne Jacobs
  • erik martin
  • Catherine R. Osborne
  • Christine E. McCarthy
  • Leo Guardado
  • Kelly L. Schmidt & Billy Critchley-Menor, S.J.
  • The Editors
  • Guest Post
  • DT Podcast
  • Dave de la Fuente
  • Dannis Matteson
  • Heather M. DuBois
  • Gunnar B. Gundersen
  • John DeCostanza
  • Jessica Wrobleski
  • Kevin M Johnson
  • John P. Slattery
  • Katharine Mahon
  • Katherine Wrisley Shelby
  • Kathleen Bellow
  • Br. Ken Homan, SJ
  • Kevin Ahern
  • Katherine A. Greiner
  • Krista Stevens
  • Andrew Staron
  • Lorraine Cuddeback-Gedeon
  • Marjorie Corbman
  • Michael L. Avery
  • Marcus Mescher
  • Michael Rubbelke
  • Meg Stapleton Smith
  • Katie O'Neill
  • Paul Louis Metzger
  • Stephen Okey
Advertisements
Advertisements

Categories

Advent Catholicism Catholic Social Teaching Christian Life Church Community Conversation Conversion Current Events Discipleship Doing Theology Ethics Faith Guest Post Jesus Christ Justice Lent Mercy Podcast Politics Pop Culture Pope Francis Racism Saints Shark Week Social Justice Solidarity Spirituality Theology and Culture Vatican
Advertisements
Advertisements
Advertisements
Advertisements

Tags

#Laudato Si Advent Anti-Racism Catholic Catholic Church Catholic Higher Education Catholicism Catholic Social Teaching Christianity Christmas Church College Theology Society Community conversation dialogue discipleship education Ethics Eucharist faith Forgiveness grace Higher Education Holy Spirit Hope Incarnation Jesuits Jesus Jesus Christ John DeCostanza John Paul II Kevin Ahern Lent liberation theology Liturgy love Martin Luther King Mary Media Mercy Ministry Oscar Romero peace Pentecost podcast podcast season 1 podcast season 2 Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis Prayer Public Theology Race racism resurrection Saint Leo University Saints scripture Shark Week social justice spirituality Stephen Okey Stephen Okey Podcast Episode Teaching Teaching Theology technology Theological Shark Week theology theology and culture Thomas Merton Vacation Bible School Vatican Vatican II vocation war white supremacy
Advertisements
Advertisements
Advertisements
Advertisements
Advertisements
Advertisements
Website Built with WordPress.com.
Footer navigation
  • About Us
  • Theological Shark Weeks
  • DT Podcast
  • Who We Are

Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

  • Follow Following
    • Daily Theology
    • Join 8,346 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Daily Theology
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.

    %d bloggers like this: